Surupa Chakraborty, Amity University, Kolkata
Recent updates
“On Thursday, the Delhi High Court (HC) restrained Sci-Hub and Libgen, the two online repositories providing free access to paywalled research, from uploading, publishing or making available any article till January 6 on a plea by the three global academic publishers, Elsevier Ltd., Wiley India Pvt. Ltd. and American Chemical Society, claiming copyright infringement.”
-As mentioned in the court declaration.
Elsevier, Wiley, and ACS had filed a case in the High Court seeking a ban on the two alleged pirated websites that offer free access to academic research. The three international academic publishers charge a subscription fee for accessing the content published by them and have alleged that Sci-Hub and Libgen, which store 84 million articles and 80 million papers, are infringing on their exclusive rights to the manuscripts of academic research papers.
A significant part of the Indian science community, starting from scientists, researchers, professors, teachers, and students strongly opposed the contention of the lawsuit and have signed a petition supporting free access to knowledge, urging the HC and the government to allow them to access to academic and research papers through Sci-Hub and Libgen.
Challenges
The charges to access corporate-gated science are highly regressive towards developing countries like India. Most of the well-endowed engineering, medical and scientific institutes in the country are unable to afford the subscription costs of all the journals or research papers from Elsevier and others, hence they use SciHub and Libgen for accessing the articles.
Most academic institutions in India are unable to afford the required tens of thousands of dollars for buying and maintaining institutional access. Even with institutional access, it is often difficult to access every article provided by each of these scientific journals. In such scenarios, Sci-Hub and Libgen, two of the biggest ‘shadow library” websites or open-source access publications, have always been the go-to alternative for accessing the otherwise inaccessible, under high paywall research articles and help in the progress in the research field.
SciHub is a self-proclaimed website that operates outside the reach of Western authorities and publishers. It was developed by a Kazakhstani computer programmer- Alexandra Elbakyan, as an effort to make all academic-journals and their articles free to read, and thereby immeasurably improving the exchange of knowledge between the growing scientific community. She also claims in one of her interviews that it had to be done for the sake of providing free knowledge to all, as she believes that no one should face such restrictions in their pursuit of knowledge.
Ever since its release, Sci-Hub has been a boon to many, mostly due to its ability to bypass paywalls to provide access to knowledge, and for the ease in downloading research papers. It demolishes the pitiful claims of academic gatekeeping and the publishing industry, which has enjoyed profits by magnanimous margins based on unpaid labour. It has served the research community immensely for years, especially for developing third-world countries. Thus the transition from an openly accessible system of scientific communication to a restricted one will serve as a heavy blow on the Indian scientific community. Many medical professionals who have an interest in research-based medicines and treatments are forced to use open-access websites like Sci-hub because of the high pricing structure of the academic publishers. A low income and developing country like India would surely have its medical and academic research and treatment potential suppressed if they ban sites like Sci-Hub and Libgen.
P. Balaram, a senior biochemist and former director of the IIS, Bangalore, wrote to India’s Science and Technology Ministry requesting their intervention to ensure that this case doesn’t block the access of Indian researchers to content from the said websites. He mentioned that the government should not allow the websites to be blocked without an investigation “into monopolistic and unfair pricing in the science publishing industry”.
Moreover, apart from the essential factors that directly predict the chances of future citations, limited access to these publications might limit the aim of the actual scientific research from achieving its full potential. There is a clear reflection that demands between accessibility, profitability, and unmet requirements for publication and thereby, requires very careful consideration by the eminent law-makers of the country.
Sources:
Also read: BRAIN FOG: A temporary post-COVID-19 brain disorder
COVAXIN : India’s preparation for massive vaccination drive.
-Chitra Roy, University of Calcutta Covaxin, India’s indigenous COVID-19 vaccine, has been a subject of criticism due to its approval for restricted emergency use despite hot having published any phase 3 efficacy data. However, until recently, Bharat Biotech, the manufacturer of Covaxin claimed that its vaccine potentially generated safety data with the robust immune response […]